Proposal for waste management and disposal in Muzo, Boyaca
Keywords:
integral waste management, TOPSIS, valuable waste, recycling
Abstract
This work presents a technical summary of the elaboration of the proposal for solid waste treatment in Muzo, Boyaca, during 2016. The diagnosis of waste management panorama was realized, including the results of characterization. About 25 tons of solid waste per week were produced; 63.7 % of which were organic waste; 17.21 % valuable waste; and 4.74 % high complexity waste. After that, the best option for each type is selected according to the real conditions of location, by means of diffuse TOPSIS technique (technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution). Finally, the definitive proposal is presented, focused to the recovery
References
Alcaldía Municipal de Muzo, Boyacá. (2013). Informe gestión integral de residuos. Muzo, Boyacá. p.10.
Alcaldía municipal de Muzo. (2016). Plan de desarrollo más para Muzo 2016-2019 Retrieved from http://www.muzo-boyaca.gov.co/metas-objetivos-e-indicadores/plan-de-desarrollo-mas-para-muzo-2016--2019
Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management science, 17(4), B-141.
Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multi attribute decision making, lecture notes in economics and mathematical system series, vol. 375.
Coban, A., Ertis, I. F., & Cavdaroglu, N. A. (2018). Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of cleaner production, 180, 159-167.
Departamento de Planeación Nacional. (2016). Conpes 3874, Política nacional para la gestión integral de residuos sólidos. Bogotá D.C.: Retrieved from https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Econ%C3%B3micos/3874.pdf
Departamento nacional de estadísticas. http://www.dane.gov.co/files/censos/libroCenso2005nacional.pdf. Visto el 5 de octubre de 2016
Díaz Bohórquez, L. F., & Gallego Escobar, L. A. (2016). Propuesta para el manejo y disposición de los residuos sólidos generados en el municipio de Muzo, Boyacá (Bachelor's thesis, Fundación Universidad de América).
Ekmekçioğlu, M., Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste. Waste management, 30(8-9), 1729-1736.
Estay-Ossandon, C., Mena-Nieto, A., & Harsch, N. (2018). Using a fuzzy TOPSIS-based scenario analysis to improve municipal solid waste planning and forecasting: a case study of Canary archipelago (1999–2030). Journal of cleaner production, 176, 1198-1212.
García-Cascales, M. S., & Lamata, M. T. (2010). Nueva aproximación al método tópsis difuso con etiquetas lingüísticas. In ESTYLF, XV Congreso Español sobre Tecnologías y Lógica Fuzzy.
Heidari, R., Yazdanparast, R., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2019). Sustainable Design of a Municipal Solid Waste Management System Considering Waste Separators: A Real-World Application. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101457.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58-191). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
ICONTEC. Guía técnica colombiana (GTC86). Guía para la implementación de la gestión integral de residuos. Bogotá D.C., Colombia. 22 de octubre de 2003. Ed. 2003-11-11. I.C.S.: 13.030.50., p. 8.
Kaliszewski, I., & Podkopaev, D. (2016). Simple additive weighting—A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 54, 155-161.
Kharat, M. G., Murthy, S., Kamble, S. J., Raut, R. D., Kamble, S. S., & Kharat, M. G. (2018). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis for environmentally conscious solid waste treatment and disposal technology selection. Technology in Society.
Kutlu, A. C., & Ekmekçioğlu, M. (2012). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 61-67.
Lo, C. C., Chen, D. Y., Tsai, C. F., & Chao, K. M. (2010, April). Service selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS method. In 2010 IEEE 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (pp. 367-372). IEEE.
Superintendencia de servicios públicos. (2018). Informe de disposición final de residuos sólidos – 2017. Bogotá D.C.
Wibowo, S., & Deng, H. (2015). Multi-criteria group decision making for evaluating the performance of e-waste recycling programs under uncertainty. Waste Management, 40, 127-135.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information sciences, 8(3), 199-249.
Alcaldía municipal de Muzo. (2016). Plan de desarrollo más para Muzo 2016-2019 Retrieved from http://www.muzo-boyaca.gov.co/metas-objetivos-e-indicadores/plan-de-desarrollo-mas-para-muzo-2016--2019
Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management science, 17(4), B-141.
Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multi attribute decision making, lecture notes in economics and mathematical system series, vol. 375.
Coban, A., Ertis, I. F., & Cavdaroglu, N. A. (2018). Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decision making methods: A case study in Istanbul, Turkey. Journal of cleaner production, 180, 159-167.
Departamento de Planeación Nacional. (2016). Conpes 3874, Política nacional para la gestión integral de residuos sólidos. Bogotá D.C.: Retrieved from https://colaboracion.dnp.gov.co/CDT/Conpes/Econ%C3%B3micos/3874.pdf
Departamento nacional de estadísticas. http://www.dane.gov.co/files/censos/libroCenso2005nacional.pdf. Visto el 5 de octubre de 2016
Díaz Bohórquez, L. F., & Gallego Escobar, L. A. (2016). Propuesta para el manejo y disposición de los residuos sólidos generados en el municipio de Muzo, Boyacá (Bachelor's thesis, Fundación Universidad de América).
Ekmekçioğlu, M., Kaya, T., & Kahraman, C. (2010). Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste. Waste management, 30(8-9), 1729-1736.
Estay-Ossandon, C., Mena-Nieto, A., & Harsch, N. (2018). Using a fuzzy TOPSIS-based scenario analysis to improve municipal solid waste planning and forecasting: a case study of Canary archipelago (1999–2030). Journal of cleaner production, 176, 1198-1212.
García-Cascales, M. S., & Lamata, M. T. (2010). Nueva aproximación al método tópsis difuso con etiquetas lingüísticas. In ESTYLF, XV Congreso Español sobre Tecnologías y Lógica Fuzzy.
Heidari, R., Yazdanparast, R., & Jabbarzadeh, A. (2019). Sustainable Design of a Municipal Solid Waste Management System Considering Waste Separators: A Real-World Application. Sustainable Cities and Society, 101457.
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58-191). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
ICONTEC. Guía técnica colombiana (GTC86). Guía para la implementación de la gestión integral de residuos. Bogotá D.C., Colombia. 22 de octubre de 2003. Ed. 2003-11-11. I.C.S.: 13.030.50., p. 8.
Kaliszewski, I., & Podkopaev, D. (2016). Simple additive weighting—A metamodel for multiple criteria decision analysis methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 54, 155-161.
Kharat, M. G., Murthy, S., Kamble, S. J., Raut, R. D., Kamble, S. S., & Kharat, M. G. (2018). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision analysis for environmentally conscious solid waste treatment and disposal technology selection. Technology in Society.
Kutlu, A. C., & Ekmekçioğlu, M. (2012). Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(1), 61-67.
Lo, C. C., Chen, D. Y., Tsai, C. F., & Chao, K. M. (2010, April). Service selection based on fuzzy TOPSIS method. In 2010 IEEE 24th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (pp. 367-372). IEEE.
Superintendencia de servicios públicos. (2018). Informe de disposición final de residuos sólidos – 2017. Bogotá D.C.
Wibowo, S., & Deng, H. (2015). Multi-criteria group decision making for evaluating the performance of e-waste recycling programs under uncertainty. Waste Management, 40, 127-135.
Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning—I. Information sciences, 8(3), 199-249.
How to Cite
Correa Mahecha, F., Sandoval Herrera, J. A., Díaz Bohórquez, L. F., & Gallego Escobar, L. (2019). Proposal for waste management and disposal in Muzo, Boyaca. Revista De Investigación, 12(1), 87–97. Retrieved from https://revistasuamericaeduco.biteca.online/index.php/rinv/article/view/218
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Published
2019-08-30
Issue
Section
Artículos de Revisión
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Investigación
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
